Cattle Close with Thursday Losses

Posted on 2026 年 2 月 5 日 by admin

Live cattle rounded out a weaker Thursday session, with contracts down $5 to $6.20. The Thursday Fed Cattle Exchange online auction showed no sales on the 1,602 head offered, with bids ranging from $235 to $236. Cash movement has been quiet this week.

Feeder cattle futures were down $6 to $7.50 in the front months during the Thursday session. The CME Feeder Cattle Index rose 59 cents to $375.16 on February 4.

Late on Wednesday, workers at the Greeley, CO JBS plant, which processes approximately 5,000 head per day, voted to authorize a strike. However, they did not provide specifics on the timeline for when the strike might begin.

USDA reported 19,748 metric tons (MT) of beef sold in the week ending January 29 — the largest volume so far this calendar year. South Korea was the largest buyer, purchasing 7,600 MT, followed by Japan with 6,300 MT.

Shipments were tallied at 12,992 MT, which was 3.32% above the previous week but down 34.53% from the same week last year. Of that total, 4,400 MT was shipped to South Korea, with 3,800 MT headed to Japan.

Wholesale boxed beef prices were lower in Thursday afternoon’s report. The Choice/Select spread stood at $6.88. Choice boxes fell 77 cents to $367.25, while Select boxes were down $1.72 at $360.37.

USDA reported federally inspected cattle slaughter at 114,000 head for Thursday, bringing the weekly total to 450,000 head. This is 14,000 head above last week but 23,336 head fewer than the same week last year.

Closing prices for live cattle and feeder cattle on Thursday were as follows:
– Feb 26 Live Cattle: $235.25, down $5.28
– Apr 26 Live Cattle: $235.60, down $6.20
– Jun 26 Live Cattle: $232.20, down $5.03
– Mar 26 Feeder Cattle: $364.08, down $6.00
– Apr 26 Feeder Cattle: $360.50, down $7.00
– May 26 Feeder Cattle: $356.20, down $7.55

On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not hold positions, either directly or indirectly, in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data provided are for informational purposes only. For more details, please view the Barchart Disclosure Policy.

—

**Related Articles:**
– Live and Feeder Cattle Rally on USDA COF Report; Lean Hogs Are Technically Strong
– How Much Higher Can Cattle Prices Go Here?
– Cattle Collapsed on Screwworm Fears, but Fundamentals Are Bullish
– Was Friday’s Trade an Overreaction?
– How Much Higher Can Cattle Prices Go in 2026?

*The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Nasdaq, Inc.*
https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/cattle-close-thursday-losses

Here’s Why Tokenized Bank Deposits Don’t Stand a Chance Against Stablecoins

admin
2025 年 11 月 2 日
0

The post Here’s Why Tokenized Bank Deposits Don’t Stand a Chance Against Stablecoins appeared com. BlockchainFintech Traditional banks are finally experimenting with blockchain. Yet their latest innovation, tokenized deposits, may be arriving years too late. Financial institutions envision a future where everyday checking balances live on a distributed ledger. But for Omid Malekan, adjunct professor at Columbia Business School, the concept is little more than a digital illusion one destined to be eclipsed by stablecoins. The Great Banking Copycat Moment In the last decade, crypto projects built what banks never could: instantly transferable digital dollars that actually work. Now, banks want in but without giving up control. Their idea is to take customer deposits and issue them as blockchain-based tokens, effectively “on-chain bank balances.” Malekan dismisses the model as self-defeating. Tokenized deposits, he argues, are the blockchain equivalent of a private intranet in an era of global internet connectivity secure, limited, and ultimately obsolete. These instruments would be usable only among customers of the same institution, fenced in by compliance layers like KYC and transaction permissioning. “What use is a token that can’t travel?” he wrote, describing them as digital checking accounts that stop at the bank’s front door. Stablecoins Already Solved the Problem While banks are still building walled gardens, stablecoins have spent years integrating into open networks that now underpin DeFi, cross-border payments, and on-chain commerce. They are interoperable, composable, and transferable without middlemen. Most importantly, they rely on transparent, full-reserve backing not fractional banking to ensure stability. That structure, Malekan argues, makes them safer from a risk perspective. Stablecoin issuers must hold equivalent assets in cash or short-term treasuries, giving them a liquidity profile banks can’t match. Tokenized deposits, by contrast, remain exposed to the same lending risk that defines the traditional system. Why Yields Will Decide Everything The real blow, however, could come from returns. As.

general

Is XRP ETF Sell-the-News Event? $15.5 Million Weekly Outflows Warn About It

admin
2025 年 11 月 17 日
0

The post Is XRP ETF Sell-the-News Event? $15. 5 Millicom. The first full week of XRP’s ETF era did not unfold the way the community expected because, instead of a continuation of the long inflow streak that began right after XRP was ruled not a security in 2023, the market delivered the exact opposite a $15. 5 million outflow from XRP-tied investment products, the largest single-week reversal since the asset reentered institutional rotation last year. XRPC’s debut on Nov. 13 produced no net creations on day one, but the next session pulled in $243 million through cash and in-kind flows, and trading volume hit $58 million, the highest opening print of any ETF launched this year out of more than 900 products. It even edged past the spot Solana ETF launch, which landed at $57 million. Source:.